There were statistically significant (p<.0001) effects of group status on the CVLT-II total recall discriminability and recognition discriminability indices. Participants with complicating premorbid histories or who scored below 15/16 on the CVLT-II forced choice recognition trial were excluded. At this time, the test is too new for additional studies beyond that of the standardization sample to have appeared in the peer-reviewed literature.Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) after traumatic brain injury Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) after.ĪbstractThe California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) was performed by 200 participants, divided into moderate–severe traumatic brain injury (n=43), mild traumatic brain injury (n=57) and demographically matched control (n=100) groups. As would be expected, the bibliography is quite extensive. There is discussion concerning the matter of demographic adjustments and the use of the CVLT-3 as a measure of “performance validity.” Chapter 6 of the Manual offers a detailed review of studies from 1999 to 2017 that used a version of the CVLT to study patterns of performance in a wide variety of clinical groups. The Manual characterizes alternate form reliability as “robust” and similar to figures obtained with the earlier version of the test. The Manual states that the test was updated in several ways including development of additional intrusion and yes/no recognition memory measures, use of scaled score metric to permit comparison with performance on other tests that employ scaled scores, addition of index scores in standard score format. This version was normed on 700 individuals aged 16–90 years. The test can also be administered in digital format. The former follow the same format and employ the same content as the CVLT-II described below, while the latter consists of 4 learning trials followed by a short-delay free recall trial (NB: there is no short-delay cued recall) and long-delay recall without and with categorical cueing. The new version has two parallel forms of 16 items each and a 9-item brief form. While this edition of the Encyclopedia was in preparation, the CVLT-3 was published. Editorial Addendum: The text below pertains primarily to the CVLT-II (2000).

Cvlt ii scoring